Date |
Opponent |
Location |
TV |
Time (PT) |
Tickets |
Gamble |
|
9/01/07 |
Idaho |
L.A. Coliseum |
FSN | 7:15PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
9/15/07 |
Nebraska |
Lincoln, NE |
ABC | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
9/22/07 |
Washington State |
L.A. Coliseum |
ABC | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
09/29/07 |
Washington |
Seattle, WA |
ABC/ESPN/ESPN2 | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
10/06/07 |
Stanford |
L.A. Coliseum |
Versus | 4:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
10/13/07 |
Arizona |
L.A. Coliseum |
TBA | TBA | Buy | Sell | Bet |
10/20/07 |
Notre Dame |
South Bend, IN |
NBC | 12:30PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
10/27/07 |
Oregon |
Eugene, OR |
FSN | 12:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
11/03/07 |
Oregon State |
L.A. Coliseum |
ABC/ESPN/ESPN2 | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
11/10/07 |
Cal |
Berkeley, CA |
ABC/ESPN/ESPN2 | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
11/22/07 |
Arizona State |
Tempe, AZ |
ESPN | 5:00PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
12/01/07 |
UCLA |
L.A. Coliseum |
ABC | 1:30PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
01/01/08 |
Illinois |
Rose Bowl |
ABC | 2:10PM | Buy | Sell | Bet |
2007 Schedule
496 responses to “2007 Schedule”
-
When I say 10-12 I mean 10 for 12
-
hey lets keep C dub for another three 3yrs. ‘Cause he’s charlie weis…the irish savior, he got what it takes to bring the irish back to prominincy amember? i mean remember?
-
last night, i spent a long while going over the rest of the season to see where SC could get. My final(after the bowl games)put SC in second, after beating Ohio State convincingly in the rose bowl. LSU routs Boston College…. putting LSU #1 and SC #2. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge SC fan. The reason Oklahoma is not in the BCS Bowl game is because i am predicting the upset at Texas Tech and Ohio State falls to Michigan in a close bout.
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4 weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4 weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4 weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4 weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4 weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
I disagree. If you have USC winning the rest of the way there is no way they wont be in the title game, and same for LSU. I just think LSU will lose another game either to Alabama in two weeks on the road, or to Florida in the SEC title game assuming they will play again. Now the best game on Saturday will be USC v.s Oregon, but the game of the week will be Boston College v.s. Virginia tech both of those games will have huge implications on the BCS. For now I don’t think any of us make those kind of predictions for another 3 to 4. weeks. however that would be very interesting if it did end up like that
-
USC is now #12 in the BCS. Should they be able to win out they for sure would pass up ASU, Oregon (they would have beaten them), and USF (strength of schedule down the strecth). That only gets them to #9. Toss up if remaining strength of schedule could get them by OK, WV, Va Tech, Kansas or FL without those teams losing down the stretch. No way they pass OSU, BC, or LSU without those teams losing down the stretch. However, Kansas or OK has to lose (they would play in the Big 12 title game if neither loses before then); BC or Va Tech has to lose (they play Thurs); and I think FL gets to the SEC championship game if they win out so LSU or FL has to lose (they would play again if neither loses before that). That puts USC anywhere from 4-6 based on “must losses” should they win out. They need outright help after that. BTW “troy rocks”, if Michigan beats OSU, Michigan will be going to the Rose Bowl, not OSU, unless Michigan loses some Big 10 games before that matchup (they are undefeated in the Big 10 as of now). I think winning out would give USC a reasonable shot at the title game (based on the historical likeliness of some upsets down the stretch), but only provide for sure a top 5 or 6 pre-bowl position. A loss this weekend in Eugene puts an end to all such theoretical speculation and hope however. On the other hand, a win would be the first definitive evidence I’ve seen this year that they really can perform at the level that would be necessary to run the table down the stretch.
-
If USC wins on Saturday v.s. Oregon they will move up rapidly, because people can already start to see now that this team is healthier they are starting to look like the team we once called #1, and just the fact that they are USC such a big name, and if they do win there conference for a 6th straight year, a conference that is the 2nd toughest in the nation, they will definitely be in the picture. Also remember in college football you control your own destiny, you dont have to always hope for losses around the country. also remember lets say Kansas is playing Iowa St. and they barely speak by, and on the same week USC beats Arizona St. you don’t think they will move ahead, and for Ohio St. I am almost certain that they will lose at least once I think they will lose this Saturday to Penn St. for teams like BC, or Kansas, they are do to lose again, I know that if USC wins the rest of the way it will be enough to move them up to #2 or #1, and remember the way things have been going this year there are sill allot more shake ups and upsets waiting to be happened
-
USC FANS YOU GUYS ARE FORGETTING THAT WERE #2 IN THE PAC 10 AND YOU GUYS ARE #3 OK SO WE LOST TO NOTRE DAME BUT LOL U GUYS LOST TO STANFORD
-
Wait until december first, then we’ll talk pac-10 standings.
-
Brian that’s only because you guys have played more PAC 10 games than USC, and besides if USC wins the rest of the way out they’ll win the win the PAC 10, and you can’t talk because your team is not even ranked. Do you want me to tell you why, because UCLA will always have 2-3 straight games when they play great, and people start to think oh this team is ligate, and all of a sudden as inconsistent as they are they lose to some unranked team and thats something that happens to them 3-4 times a season, and most of that is due to Carl Dorrells lack of preparation.
-
Do you think your rapist quarterback will pull off a win this weekend? I heard the LAPD is going to serve him w/ a paternity suit in the locker room at halftime. You may want to give him a heads up.
PS-Rub some cream on your injured Booty.
-
It’s probably a good thing that you guys won’t be involved in the National Championship this year. I heard it’s in New Orleans. With all those boobs flashed in front of Mark Sanchez in the streets, the sexual predator relapse is almost a certainty.
-
Dam Jmoney I thought you died or something, well I geus we cant always gat what we want, if you dont mind were trying to have a normal conversation about football, so why dont you fuck off, this time for good
-
Didn’t see any of yesterday’s game, but purely judging by the stats it may have actually been USC’s best showing of the season considering the level of competition. They were in it right to then end but between the possessions with back to back turnovers and the horrible clock management on that last drive (three runs on the first four plays when you need to go 70 yards in three minutes with only one time out?) it was just a bit too much. Anyway, how big is the ASU/Oregon game next week? Winner has an VERY good chance at playing for the BCS Title. I think Oregon is a legit contender for that. Yesterday’s win over Cal was ASU’s first quality win; but considering Cal’s history of folding once they drop a game I’m not yet completely sold on ASU. Irratic UCLA drops one to WSU. Who knows what to expect next?
USC can still guarantee themselves at least a tie for second in the Pac-10 by winning out. However, they could just about as easily lose out too. Oregon St is 5-3 (3-2 in Pac-10 themselves), Cal in Berkeley will be no picnic even with their recent woes, ASU at Tempe and then UCLA. They can still salvage a respectable season and likely top 10 finish, or this could be an even more dissapointing season than it has been to date.
On the national scene, OSU looked the most impressive they have to date taking apart PSU at Happy Valley, they may have just enough to win out and get to the BCS title game yet again; BC may ride the semi-miracle finish they pulled of in Blacksburg Thursday to the title game (no future game looks even as tough as that one looked on paper–but an upset could easily still loom as pressure mounts). If those two go down just imagine the possible arguments (LSU, Oregon, ASU, OSU, BC, Oklahoma, Kansas, WV, even Missouri). The Oregon/ASU game likley clears one of those teams out; and the only one of the Big 12 teams will be standing after the Big 12 title game, but still quite a potential BCS nightmare. It’ll be interesting to see if enough teams get to two or more losses to clear out the mess before the season ends.
-
Hey, I’m just thrilled to see your QB dodging defenders in the backfield. He has a knack for shaking free, whether it’s breaking the tackle from the grasp of a pass rushing defensive end or, say, having his lawyers dismantle the mounting legal evidence of a county prosecutor.
-
For USC to win the PAC 10 for a 6th straight year they of course need to win out, also they need ASU to lose a game before they play each other, because say if USC does win out but if ASU’s only loss is to USC, ASU will still win the PAC 10 the also need to hope for Oregon to lose another game. however if USC goes 10-2, and doesn’t win the PAC 10 I still think they will be given a BCS bowl. I think if they win a BCS bowl this year and finish 10-2. Next year will be their prime, because they will have 10 offensive starters returning, and 8 defensive starters and next year I think guys like Patrick Turner, vidal Hazeleton, Joe McKnight, and Stefon Johnson will become featured players.
-
Chances on a 6th straight Pac-10 title are slim at best. All they can do is focus on winning their games. From what I’ve seen thus far, I’ll be pleasantly surprised for them to win out (doable, but not likely if their level of play does not improve). They lose a tie break to Oregon should they end up in a two-way tie; assuming they won out they’d have the two-way tie break against any other team; not sure how a three-or-more team tie break works in the Pac-10. 10-2 could possibly get a non-Rose BCS bowl bid because of the name draw of USC (ratings, ratings, ratings); would depend on how many at large slots are available and how teams vying for them end up with only one loss or less.
Regarding next year; I’ll wait and reserve judgment. As I recall, most everyone was saying THIS was their year based on last year’s Rose Bowl performance and the number of starters they had returning….
-
One way for USC to get to the Rose Bowl:
1. Win the remaining games (duh!) & finish 7-2 in Conference play.
2. Pray that Oregon also wins their remaining games and gets invited to the BCS championship game. Go Ducks!
3. USC will finish with a 2nd place tie with ASU both at 7-2 (ASU will have lost to Oregon and USC) but will get the bid to the Rose Bowl because they will have beaten ASU.
Simple, right?
-
Not going to happen. The Pac Ten is actually good for the first time in my lifetime. Get ready to head down that long descent that Florida State started a few years back when the ACC stepped it up.
Pete Carroll should have bailed when it looked like he could handle an NFL job. Poor guy, now he has to spend time having his offensive line protect his QB during the game, and the university has to protect the ladies on campus from the QB’s sexual appetite.
So ironic that he could have avoided getting caught if he would have just used a Trojan.
-
USC just needs to focus on winning nothing else just winning every thing will come to the if they just win the rest of there games. They need to concentrate on one game at a time.
-
It was a gamble, glad I didn’t have to make the call. Sanchez got the start, and the kid has a strong arm, but threw too many picks……doesn’t matter that he’s the back up. I won’t trust him to run this team in the future.
I’m not gonna rip on the Offense, even though I dislike Sarkisian’s play calling. He sucks big Oregon Ducks!
I’m gonna rip on the defense. The scheme was a bull crap piece of work. You can not justify having a healthy Cushing off of the field. You suck coach. They should have left you back at idaho. Gone are the days that the D-Line were slanted towards the inside. This would have been an excellent day to return to that style….have the tackles play a five technique angled/cocked towards the helmets of the guards ~ same thing for the ends but aimed at the tackles. You a$$holes you used to do that with the wild bunch. As a D-line coach, I loved that path, especially for a team that runs that Urban Meyer crap shotgun option. The D ends would have been killing it in the backfield………..but no, you chose that bull$h!t scheme with #41 and #43 on the field. Hey coach, those two a$$holes are special teams players! Your frikin ballers are (in order) ~ Cushing, Rivers, Rey, and #47 (forgot his name). If you run a scheme that takes these guys off the field and places your “specail” teams guys on, you are an ass hole. -
I just hope they finish 11-2 and win any type of BCS bowl, the worst I hope they dois a Fiesta bowl, Im cool with that that will still give them a 5-1 BCS bowl record in the past 6 years, any BCS bowl is great at this point.
-
Well, should USC find a way to win their next three, they would be a very attractive BCS bowl pick. Should the Ducks win out and end up getting into the championship game, a two loss USC would almost be a lock for the Rose Bowl as the Rose Bowl committee will always opt for BIG 10/PAC 10 teams (preferably a BIG 10/PAC 10 matchup) if it makes any sense–and a two loss USC team (that would likely be in the top 10 if they can finish the season with only two losses) would make sense. Now, if it were OSU/Oregon in the title game; I’m not sure who the Rose Bowl would select as their first pick (only that they would be seething at a BIG 10/PAC 10 matchup for the BCS Championship not being played in the Rose Bowl; but I think a two loss USC team would be more attractive than the second place BIG 10 team (likely a three loss Michigan) in that situation. Hard to say who the opponent would be in such a scenario. But that possibility is a few weeks away; we’ll see how things stand week by week.
-
Imagine the arguments as to who should be in the title game in a scenario similar to this:
1. OSU loses to Michigan
2. Kansas ends up undeated, meaning they beat Missouri and then OK in the BIG 12 title game; or Missouri wins out beating Kansas and then OK in the BIG 12 title game; or OK wins out including the BIG 12 title game.
3. Rest of the top 10 one loss teams win out.
You have the following one loss (or in Kansas’s case undefeated) Conference champions from major conferences:ACC: Boston College
BIG 12: Kansas, Missouri or Oklahoma
Big East: West Virginia
PAC 10: Oregon
SEC: LSUand OSU would have only one loss; having been #1 until the last week of the season, but not even win the BIG 10 (they would lose the tie break to Michigan even if Michigan falls to Wisconsin; which means that after Michigan’s horrific first two weeks of the season, they can guarantee themselves a Rose Bowl berth by beating OSU, no matter what they do against Wisconsin). And if OSU lost to ILL and then beat Michigan, they would be another one loss major conference champion.
Anyway, can you imagine the arguments about which two of those teams should be in the title game? You would have at least three one-loss major conference champion teams being left out in the cold; with another possible 2-3 one loss teams from those conferences to boot.
Here’s another simpler scenario: If Kansas, Oregon and LSU were to win out, should Kansas pass up those two teams? Hard to say that an undefeated team (including a conference championship game) from a major conference should be left out of the BCS title game in favor of another one-loss major conference champion.
The BCS may get lucky in the last few weeks of the season as they have in the past and end up with one one or two teams legitimitly getting done wrong; but there are a number of ways there could be some real heated debates/arguments regarding who among a half dozen teams or more “deserve” to be in the title game. I’m pulling for one of those scenarios myself, just for the fun of it.
-
I just thought of a scenario I might enjoy even more:
OSU, LSU and Kansas win out. LSU stays #2 in the AP (behind OSU but ahead of Kansas) but between the USAToday, Harris and computer polls an undefeated Kansas squeaks by LSU to #2 in the BCS and gets in the title game against OSU. LSU convincingly wins their bowl game over the number 4 or 5 team while Kansas barely squeaks by OSU in an unimpressive championship game. As a result, the AP voters keep LSU ahead of Kansas in their poll, leaving Kansas with the BCS title and LSU with the AP title. I’m sure LSU fans would maintain their consistency in how they really did not win any championship–the AP means nothing and only the BCS title game winner means anything…NOT! But it MAYBE might get them to whine just a little less about 2003 (or am I too optimistic?)
I’d actually prefer to see the Ducks manage to get in the title game and win it; but wouldn’t the above scenario have some ironic poetic justice to it?
-
Why is Gameday traveling to Williamstown massachusets, for a game between Arthrec College vs Williamstown University, Im not kidding its on College football.com
-
It’s Amherst vs Williams. My best guess from looking up the game on Wikipedia is because it’s the second oldest rivalry in America (Yale vs Harvard first played in 1875; and both Amherst vs Williams and Lehigh vs Lafayette were first played in in 1884). They call it “Biggest Little Game in America”. I’m guessing Gameday decided to go with a nice, cozy, nostolgic theme; highlighting the “little guys” and “purity” of the game or something like that. Can’t say I’m necessarily opposed to such a gesture.
-
Fuck yeah!!!! cushing and maluluaga are coming back next season!!!! they will be unstopable nex year!!! yeahhhhh! jus goes to show how much they still love football!!! football > money!!! good decision guys!!
-
U HAVE TO ADMIT , NEXT YEAR TROJANS TEAM IS GOING TO BETTER THEN THIS . U GOT MARK SANCHEZ COMING IN WITH EXPERIENCE , STAFON JOHSON 100 % HEALTHY , MARC TYLER , JOE McKNIGHT ,ALL RECEIVERS INTACT . AND MOST OF THE DEFENSE COMING BACK . THE ONLY PERSONS WE SC IS GOING 2 MISS IS SEDRICK AND LAWRENECE. BUT I WILL PUT MY MONEY ON NEXT YEARS TEAM .
-
If USC can win a BCS bowl game this year and continue the BCS dynasty it will be a great set up for next year to win another national title, I mean any BCS bowl is great, as long as we improve are BCS bowl record to 5-1 in the past 6 years, that’s pretty impresive, so as long as we loive on the BCS streak Im 100% pleased
-
Closing strong to give a legitimate opportunity to get into a BCS bowl is certainly the goal and the ideal. However, even if USC ends up with an even more disappointing season by losing one or more of their remaining conference games, pushing them into a lower tier bowl game; I hardly think it’s legitimate to not be content with their overall performance over the last 6 years.
I’m hard pressed to come up with a program that wouldn’t trade what they’ve accomplished during that time period for USC has done. Some programs might be content enough to not trade, but objectively speaking I don’t think anyone has, on a whole, outperformed USC during that period even if USC were to drop their next three.
FIGHT ON and BEAT CAL!
-
USC really needs to bring the pressure today against Cal, who has a banged up QB in Nate Longshore, I think USC has a solid day on offense but defense is what will lead them to winning big against Cal. I call USC winning 27-10. As you know I am 14-16 on my upset picks I did call Wisconsin over Michigan, I also call Illinois over OSU.
-
yeah, that little punk didn’t learn his lesson yet? ok so pete didn’t cry when you dissed us on national tv, when you chose the bears, we didn’t trip..cause there 10 more just like you! so deshaun jackson you popped off ya mouth again, and again you couldn’t find the endzone! wut up wid that.. greatest thing since wheat bread!
-
SC Running game did pretty good in the rain with 220yds from C.Washington, Good job! ASU is next on the list and another road game.. here we come. my Question is.. whats with the club house in the tree at Cal ?
FIGHT ON TROJANS !!!
-
what I hate is since USC couldnt keep up , LSU is gonna end up having to break it off in oregon, none of us down here are excited about it, just isnt the same as shuttin the trojans down, I dont know why, because oregon is the best that the pac-10 has to offer and that is saying very very little. just hang on you will see what i am talking about soon enough, NOTHING compares to SEC football, it’s a whole diffrent level of play!
-
what I hate is since USC couldnt keep up , LSU is gonna end up having to break it off in oregon, none of us down here are excited about it, just isnt the same as shuttin the trojans down, I dont know why, because oregon is the best that the pac-10 has to offer and that is saying very very little. just hang on you will see what i am talking about soon enough, NOTHING compares to SEC football, it’s a whole diffrent level of play!
-
Honestly I think Oregon will beat the shit out of LSU, and Im rooting for Oregon to get to the title so USC can play in the Rose Bowl and WIN IT FOR THE 33rd TIME!!!, and there 5th BCS bowl win in 6 years, unless Oregon loses a game or two and USC just ends up winning the PAC 10. However Oregon has Arizona on Thursday and Arizona is known for there big upsets at home during November. Remember in 2005 #4 UCLA went to Arizona during Novemember and got blown out, and last year #7 Cal went to Arizona during November and they olso lost. Is this a sign of things to come as #2 Oregon will head to Arizona on Thursday night on NOVEMBER 15? I am 15-17 on my upset picks this year. I just called Illinois over OSU, and Wisconsin over Michigan. However I cant decide weather I want call Arizona over Oregon. Mike D what do you think is all the vodoo enough for me to call this huge upset.
-
sec fan, objectively speaking based on current data, I would say that the SEC is the best conference this year; however, all of their teams have shown some flaws and there are a number of quality teams from other conferences too. I mean, you could end up having Tennesse, who Cal beat without too much trouble the first week of the season, in your conference championship game. Would Cal beat Tenn today? Don’t khow, but what happened is what happened.
Interesting that it was a team with a former Pac-10 coach (from Oregon to be specific) that handed LSU it’s only loss so far this year (an omen of things to come?). I think you may find this year’s Oregon team quite up to the challenge of a title game against any team in the land should they get there–but there’s a ways to go. And if Kansas ends up beating Missouri and then Oklahoma in the Big 12 title game to stay undefeated, I don’t see them not passing up at least Oregon no matter what Oregon does; likely leaving Oregon out in the cold as I don’t see them passing up LSU unless LSU stumbles and loses.
I’m quite disappointed in USC overall performance this season (how spoiled is that?–they very realistically could go 10-2, get into a BCS bowl game and I’d be admittedly disappointed), but am somewhat enjoying the turmoil at the top of the BCS standings. We’ll see how the next few weeks and the bowl season plays out.
-
tigran,
While anything is possible, and there could be an drop after two straight emotional and huge wins against two top 10 (at the time) teams, I personally just don’t see Oregon losing to Arizona unless they lose some key players (primarily read Dixon and Stewart) to injuries. I believe Dixon was a little dinged up last game but don’t know his current status. Oregon has played pretty consistently well all season and I don’t see it coming to an end now.
Depending on what UCLA team shows up, that game could be a “trap”, and they could be in a dogfight against a decent Oregon State team (I believe the best team they play down the stretch AND their rivalry game–however they get that one at home and Arizona and UCLA are on the road so…).
In a nutshell, I think Oregon will win out, and barring Kansas going undefeated will squeak into the title game (just ahead of the Big 12 winner and West Virginia). LSU being the presumed opponent, with the Big 12 winner having a slight edge over West Virginia as alternate possibilities should LSU slip. But, stranger things have happened, I just don’t anticipate them at this point (but then again, when do we, as they wouldn’t be all that strange if we did).
-
Well, USC has set themselves up with a reasonable possibility to “salvage” the season. They’ve started playing a bit better and I now have reason to believe they can, and should, beat ASU in Tempe on Thanksgiving. If they do, that should put them back into the top 10 and leave them only a very winnable game against UCLA to finish out 10-2. That would virtually guarantee them a spot in the Rose Bowl if Oregon goes to the championship game. I just can’t see the Rose Bowl committee not picking a 10-2, top 10, second place team from the PAC-10 to replace the PAC-10 champion they’d be losing. If Oregon fails to get to the title game, a 10-2, top-10 USC team is still a plum of a pick for the other BCS bowl at large bids. Of course, ASU is thinking along the same lines for themselves. A lot on the line for both teams.
-
The team I really want USC to play if theyplay in the Rose Bowl is Ohio St. How great would that be also because of the fact that USC and Ohio St. are playing in the 3rd week of the season next year.
-
I’m sure the Rose Bowl would much rather have a top-10, one loss, Big 10 champion in OSU than a three loss Michigan as the Big 10 champion–especially if Oregon ends up in the Rose Bowl as the Pac-10 champion (failing to get into the title game). An Oregon vs. Michigan rematch COULD be a good game, but based on Oregon’s earlier thrashing of Michigan at the big house, it does not have a lot of appeal going in. Let’s face it, Michigan’s three losses makes them not particularly appealing for a BCS bowl game regardless of who their opponent would be.
-
Mike D how do you see USC finishing what bowl game do you think theyll win, over who, and what will be there record? Just give me a straight up answer
-
15-3 is now my upset pick record.
This week i am going to make my biggest calls of the year.
Arizona over #2 Oregon
Kansas St. over #5 Mizzouri
Texas Tech over #4 Oklahoma
#22 Cincinatti over #6 West Varginia -
My gut right now is that USC will find a way to win their next two and finish 10-2; get into the Rose Bowl (Oregon going to the title game) and play OSU, who seems to have Michigan’s number recently. And I believe they or more likely to beat OSU than not. It won’t be easy, and may not be pretty even if I am correct; but that’s the way I see it right now.
-
Im am not turning back on my upsets that is what I am sticking with. I know its a big gamble, but I feel that this is going to be another upset week.
TrojanWire 
Leave a reply to eric #23 Cancel reply